Documents Relative to the Colonial History of New York, Vol. I — Passage 130 (part 7)
[E.B. O'Callaghan (ed.) (1856)] Did not he (the witness) well remark that this tax had in general excited great animosity among those natives, so that the Raritans shortly after killed four of our people on Staten Island ? 4. Did not Mr. Kieft on the night of the 24th February, 1643, cause a party of Indians, our friends, to be massacred with women and children in their sleep, over at Pavonia and behind Corker's plantation ? 5. Did Mr. Kieft previously propose this expedition to the Council, and was it approved by ■witness, as fiscal at that time, and by the other members of the Council ? 6. Is it not true that the Indians were much exasperated against us on account of this murder, so that the general war between them and our people followed on the next day ? 7. Did not the Dutch nation in this country live in peace with those Indians before this cruel deed had been committed against them ? HOLLAND DOCUMENTS: III. 197 Did not those Indians fly to those two places above named through fear of their enemies, in full confidence of hiding among, and of being protected by, us ? Interrogatories to be proposed to Dr. Johannes dt la Montaigne. Article 1. Did he vote for, and approve of, the maize tax in the year 1639 ? 2. Was it ever before proposed in their Council, and now when Mr. Kieft had imposed contributions on those natives, did he (La M.) not say in the presence of several persons : — that by those proceedings, a Bridge had been built, over which War would soon stalk through the country ? 3.