Graphic Presentation
Nework, N J. Baltimore, Md. Albuquerque, N Me« Phiiodelptiio, Po Bridgeport, Conn.
Sioui Foils, S Ook Roctiester, NY. Tucson, Ariz. Butte, Mont. Portlond, Maine
Peofio.lll Foil River, Mass. Atlcnto, Go Rictimond, Vo. Buftolo, NY.
Averoge, 59 cities
Omoho, Nebr Monchester, N. H. Norfolk, Vo Denver, Colo. Konsos City, Mo.
Providence, R I Binghomton, N Y. Soil Loke City, Utoh Seattle, Wosh. New Orleans, Lo.
Spokone, Wosh. Winston- Solem, N C Portlond, Oreg Memphis, Tenn. Louisville, Ky.
Oklahoma City, Okia Jacksonville, Flo Houston, Ten Indionopolis, Ind. Coltmbio, S C.
Clorksburg, W.Vo. Dallas, Te«. Cedar Rapids, lowo Columbus, Ohio Birmingham, Alo.
KnoKville, Tenn. El Poso. Te. ■ Little Rock, Ark. Wichita, Kons. Mobile. Alo
Food Clolhing, Housing Household Miscelclolhing upkeep, operation loneous
ond personal core
WPA. Division of Social Research, "Intercity Difference* in Costs of Living -- 59 Cities, " March 1935.
Annual Costs of Living, by Mdjor Budqet Groups, of a 4-Person Manual Worker's Fannily in Each of 59 Cities in the United States in March 1935.
Note the inclusion of the numerical values of the bars in the column at the left and the inclusion of the average for the 59 cities enumerated in this chart.
COMPARISON OF COMPONENT BAR CHARTS
m
cl Jon Apr
1933 1934
WPA. Division of Socinl Research. "TrpnHs in Rrlicf Ex()fn(liturfs
Oct Jon Apf Jul Ocl Dec
SCALE .7
A. Percentage Distribution of Monthly Expenditures for Public Relief and Wage Assistance in the United States for the Period fronn January 1933 to December 1935.
1. This chart and 137B present the same information, except that this gives percentages