Graphic Presentation
In the process of photostatting, some of the dots were lost, with the result that uniformity of shading was lost. For that reason the chart was redrawn.
1tt4 •« 1* 27 l* •« M 11 •« JJ »« »S St
Redrawn from U. S. Farm Credit Administration, Cooperatives Division, "Business Analysis of the Utah Poultry Producers Cooperative Association," E>ec. 1937. SCALE .6
STATE & FEDERAL GASOLINE SALES TAXES
SHOWN IN CENTS PER GALLON
SH^LC WtKACC or SAL£S TAJC* SHOWN tern CACH TtAII
AVERAGE U S rirTr ntFKCMNTATivi citics
eoM
ooe*
aoM
oo*i
«!••
a»>
M«i
M04
oin
S40O
o««i
0**1
ou*
«!•
o*«o
OVi«
.
\
;
/
\
j\
^
^SE
E S
rATi
»RIC
t IN
>INO
X :
^.„.
\k
^
\
f
"
w
i
j^ ~
!■
y/iCE
ST>
iTIOlM P»
EX<
fl
•n
:
;
.1.,!. ..
1.1..!...^
■nJ.iI..
^..J^
^
..i,.l.,i..
.ij.j.
MOTC-rUCAM. TAB
I CUT CrtCIIVC A<« tl lUA OMITMNM. </t C«MT f nCCTlVt JUM I'.IUA ■/• CCHT «IT1 «»,l-- l JIMUMW I, t»f
Joseph E. Pogue, "Economics of the Petroleum Industry," March 1939, The Chase National Bank of the City of New York.
B. Trend of Average Retail Price of Gasoline in Fifty Representative Cities in the United States by Months, 1919-1938, Showing Incidence of Gasoline Sales Tax. Courtesy of The Texas Company.
COMPARISONS WITH CURVES
SS4?=
^
il*.
i*^
k\
4JL1
fi-
R*^
rv
^
N^
-
'T*
-^
jr
r
/
xeo
T^
•^- «!
«j
'iAi
•w
'<^'